BAKFAA – Computer Program for Backcalculation of Airport Pavement Properties
We have the current version in both the full binary and setup programs. We also offer the earlier version as well.
|BAKFAA performs back-calculation of pavement layer modulus values using the FAA layered elastic analysis program LEAF and a downhill multidimensional simplex minimization method. The function minimized is the sum of the squares of the differences between vertical pavement surface deflections measured with a falling weight deflectometer (FWD) and vertical pavement surface deflections computed with the layered elastic program. The minimization routine is a direct implementation of the set of routines in section 10.4 of the book Numerical Recipes in Fortran by William H. Press, Saul A. Teukolsky, William T. Vetterling, and Brian P. Flannery, Cambridge University Press, 1992. The routines were translated from Fortran into Visual Basic. Constraints are not allowed by the minimization routine and the user must perform this function when necessary by selecting that the appropriate layer modulus values be changeable and setting the modulus values of fixed layers by hand. A version of BAKFAA with settable layer modulus constraints is planned for future implementation.The layered elastic program LEAF can also be run independently to compute pavement response for arbitrary gear geometries. The gear geometry and load configurations are entered by hand into an external ASCII file called LEAFAircraft.Ext. A header section in the file gives the required format for data entry. The file is read when LEAF starts. LEAF must therefore be closed down and restarted if changes are made to the aircraft data file. Pavement response output data appears in a separate text box for examination and cutting and pasting into external documents.
BAKFAA is a 32-bit program and requires Windows 95/98, NT, or later. System requirements will vary depending upon the version being used.
Unzip the file, copy all of the files into a directory on a hard disk. Then run setup.exe.
|This is a collection of four DOS programs:
Spreadsheets for Pavement Design
|Two Microsoft Excel spreadsheets for design of the following:|
|COMFAA is a program for computing flexible and rigid Aircraft Classification Numbers (ACNs) and pavement thickness. It is installed by running Setup.exe either with the files on a hard disk or from 2 HD floppies. The program will only run under Windows 95 or NT, or higher.The FAA does not officially support the program as a standard nor sanction any use of the results.
A help file is included which gives brief information on the capabilities of the program and how to use the various features. It would probably be useful to print the help file for reference as there is no other documentation describing operation of the program. An additional report describes the procedures used to compute pavement strength and thickness.
The external aircraft file contains the landing gears used as examples in the ICAO pavement design manual. English units are used throughout.
The ACNs are computed using the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) methodology. It is not an official FAA standard, specification or regulation, nor is it intended as a substitute for official guidance on reporting ACNs contained in ICAO publications. It is believed that the ACNs computed by this program are generally consistent with those reported by ICAO for specific aircraft, but in the event of conflict, the latter shall be considered authoritative.
In 1997, ICAO’s ACN-PCN Study Group recommended that an interim alpha factor of 0.72 at 10,000 coverages be used for computing ACN for 6-wheeled landing gears.
By default, the ACN values for 6-wheel aircraft gear configuration including the Boeing B-777 airplane are computed using this interim modified alpha factor. The standard ACN cutoff for rigid pavement stress computation is 3 times the radius of relative stiffness (rrs). This gives inconsistent results with large complex gear configurations such as the C-17 (high-strength ACN higher than low-strength ACN). An option is therefore provided to change the cut-off. This sometimes leads to numerical problems and the numerical procedure may not converge.
Flexible pavement thickness design with COMFAA follows the same methodology used to produce the thickness design charts published in FAA AC 150/5320-6. That is, for a given subgrade CBR and a given number of coverages for the design aircraft, total pavement thickness is computed by the “CBR” method. The user has to determine the design aircraft and make the conversion from aircraft departures to design aircraft coverages. Conversion of layer thicknesses with appropriate equivalency factors must also be done by the user.
Rigid pavement thickness design with COMFAA follows the same methodology used to produce the thickness design charts published in FAA AC 150/5320-6. That is, for a given modulus of subgrade reaction and a given number of coverages for the design aircraft, total pavement thickness is computed by the Westergaard edge stress method with FAA failure criteria. The user has to determine the design aircraft and make the conversion from aircraft departures to design aircraft coverages. Conversion of support layers to effective modulus of subgrade reaction must also be done by the user.
|FEAFAA (Finite Element Analysis – FAA) was developed by the FAA Airport Technology R&D Branch as a stand-alone tool for 3D finite element analysis of multiple-slab rigid airport pavements and overlays. It is useful for computing accurate responses (stresses, strains and deflections) of rigid pavement structures to individual aircraft landing gear loads. It is installed by running Setup.exe either with the files on a hard disk or from 6 HD floppies. The FAA does not officially support the program as a standard nor sanction any use of the results. A help file is included which gives brief information on the capabilities of the program and how to use the various features. It would probably be useful to print the help file for reference as there is currently no other documentation describing operation of the program. English units are used throughout, so the finite element output data should be interpreted in terms of English units (length in inches, stresses in psi, etc.).FEAFAA 1.0 is not an official FAA standard, specification or regulation. FEAFAA has been compiled to run on personal computers operating Windows 98 or higher, with a recommended minimum of 256 megabytes of RAM. Users running Windows 2000 Professional may need to install Service Pack 3.
The download includes two utility programs, HexStressReader.exe and ShellStressReader.exe, which are useful for interpreting the 3D finite element output data (which can be voluminous). The use of these utility programs is described in the program help file under “Output Data Arrangement.” It is also possible to view the mesh using the data file pltdata.dat. This is an ASCII file containing 3D finite element mesh data that can be read or converted by common postprocessing programs.
|LEDFAA 1.3 is a Computer Program for Airport Pavement Thickness Design. It is a 32-bit version and requires Windows 95/98, NT, or later. Setup requires the files:
Copy all of the files into a directory on a hard disk. Then run setup.exe.
The Alternate SG check box allows a flexible pavement design (or Life) to be run based on the vertical strain at the top of the layer below the arrow on the left side of the pavement structure. The procedure is:
See the help file under Running the Program – Options for information on Batch, No AC CDF, and No Out Files.
LEDFAA 1.3 includes the Airbus A340-500 and A340-600 aircraft in the aircraft library. The same methodology is used as for other aircraft with two wing gear and one belly gear (MD-11 and A340-200 for example) except that the A340-500/600 has a dual-tandem belly gear instead of a dual-wheel belly gear. The methodology is for the A340-500/600 to be split into two separate aircraft for design; one with the two wing gear and the other with the one belly gear. The two aircraft (for design) are shown separately in the aircraft list.
LEDFAA 1.3 includes the Airbus A380-800 and A380-800F aircraft in the aircraft library. Inclusion of these aircraft required changes to the design methodology implemented in version 1.2 because of the different number of wheels in the wing and body gears (four in the wing and six in the body). The main difference is in the flexible design procedure as follows:
The design procedure for rigid pavement design is unchanged from that in LEDFAA 1.2. The difference between the number of wheels in the wing and body gears of the A-380 is accommodated by treating the aircraft as two different aircraft in the design mix. One of the design mix aircraft is a dual tandem with the same configuration as the A-380 wing gears and the other is a dual-tridem with the same configuration as the body gears of the A-380. The separation into two design mix aircraft is transparent to the user.
A number of other changes have been made to the program either for ease of use or for improved functionality. These changes include:
LEDFAA 1.3 is an interim release of the computer program, FAArfield, now in preparation. FAArfield includes a 3-D FEM model for rigid pavement response calculations. The flexible design procedure will remain unchanged from LEDFAA 1.3 except that the failure model parameters may be adjusted as a result of the compatibility study now underway. Any changes in the flexible design parameters will result in minor differences in computed design thicknesses.
A beta version of FAArfield (called FEDFAA) is shown below.
|FEDFAA is a computer program for airport pavement thickness design. It implements both layered elastic based and 3D finite element-based design procedures developed under the sponsorship of the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for new and overlay design of flexible and rigid pavements. The layered elastic procedures, as implemented in the program, are the FAA airport pavement thickness design standards referenced in Chapter 7 of Advisory Circular AC 150/5320-6D, change 3. The core of the program is a structural response module consisting of two programs, LEAF and NIKE3D (version 3.3.2.FAA.1.0). LEAF is a layered elastic computational program implemented, in this case, as a Microsoft Windowsô dynamic link library written in Visual Basic.NETô. NIKE3D version 3.3.2.FAA.1.0 is 3D finite element computational program, written in Visual Fortran and linked to the main program through a dynamic-link library. The remainder of the program is written in Visual Basic.Net and operates under Microsoft Windows. Both LEAF and NIKE3D are loaded and executed by FEDFAA when needed and are not visible to the user.Design information is entered by means of two graphical screens, one for the structure and one for the traffic. Default values and ranges for the various input parameters have been set so that the designs produced by FEDFAA are compatible with designs produced by the design procedures in Chapter 3 of AC 150/5320-6D for aircraft up to and including the current generation (B-727, DC-8, B-747, DC-10, etc.). Designs for new generation aircraft having triple-dual-tandem (TDT) landing gear, such as the B-777, are not covered by the design procedures in Chapter 3 of AC 150/5320-6D. Chapter 7 of AC 150/5320-6D, in conjunction with FEDFAA, provides the necessary information for thickness design when TDT aircraft are included in the aircraft mix.
Apart from the procedures being implemented as a computer program instead of as nomographs, the main change in pavement design from the user’s perspective is that the “design aircraft” concept has been replaced by design for fatigue failure expressed in terms of a “cumulative damage factor” (CDF) using Miner’s rule. Also, the major material property of the pavement layers is now uniformly expressed as an elastic modulus instead of the previous CBR (California Bearing Ratio) for flexible pavements or k value for rigid pavements. Formulas for transforming CBR and k values to modulus values are provided where appropriate in the documentation. Automatic conversion is provided in the program.
It should also be borne in mind that, although layered elastic based procedures, and 3D finite element models, are normally considered to be mechanistic, and more rational than the previous procedures, a considerable amount of engineering judgement is still required. Designs produced by FEDFAA should comply with the detailed requirements and recommendations of AC 150/5320-6D. The program does not automatically satisfy all of these requirements and the recommendations in the AC should be followed in the selection of input parameters. It is the designer’s responsibility to use the program and the advisory circular in conjunction with each other.
A complete description of the design procedures and program structure is not possible within the confines of a user’s manual, and these descriptions can be found in other publications. The main intent of the user’s manual is to provide sufficient information for operating the program, selecting input data values, and interpreting the output data. Installation of the program is described first, followed by descriptions of the various parts of the program and its operation. Information is then given on the structure data input requirements and how they relate to the design procedures. Final sections provide a short discussion on program running times, with possible strategies for decreasing design time for a given design case, a description of the structure of external data files so that interested users can access the files and incorporate the data in other applications if desired, and a selection of design examples.
The relationship between the layered elastic and 3D finite element based thickness design procedures and the nomograph based thickness design procedures in Chapter 3 of AC 150/5320-6D is not discussed in the manual. However, it should be pointed out that the traffic and failure models are fundamentally different and comparisons between the two sets of procedures are only valid when considering multiple aircraft traffic mixes. Single aircraft comparisons misleadingly indicate a degree of conservatism with the LED procedures which is not present for typical multiple aircraft mixes. The program is also primarily intended for use in designing airport pavements according to a standard procedure. It is not intended to be used to compare the damaging effects of different aircraft by running single aircraft designs or CDF computations, i.e., ACN type calculations.